

Oct 15, 2025
The Production LLM playbook
Techniques for making LLMs more useful, accurate and performant in production.
Generative AI
LLM
Introduction
The biggest misconception in AI right now is that the model is the product.
Your demo vowed the investors. Then you pushed to production and users complained it was slow, expensive, and occasionally hallucinated their customer data. Sound familiar?
While the raw power of models like GPT, Gemini, or Claude is astonishing, it's just the starting point. When you move from a cool demo to a production system—where accuracy, speed, cost, and reliability are non-negotiable—you quickly learn that the base model is just the engine. The real product is the entire vehicle built around it.
Modern AI systems are not just a single model; they are a stack of intelligent techniques layered around the core LLM. The difference between a fragile prototype and a robust AI product lies in how skillfully you architect this stack.
Over the last year, I’ve worked on and observed multiple production-grade LLM systems — and the difference between a prototype and a real-world AI product almost always comes down to how well you combine these techniques. Let's break down the modern playbook for how to supercharge LLMs for production :
Techniques
Techniques
I’ve grouped these techniques into a few key categories
Layer 1 : The Foundation - Knowledge & Grounding
Goal: To connect the model factually accurate and contextually aware without expensive retraining. This is the single most effective way to reduce hallucinations.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) : Think of this as giving the model a live reference library. Instead of relying only on what it “knows” from pre-training, we fetch relevant documents from databases or vector stores, then feed them as context. You could use both structured or unstructured data for RAG. For example: A user asks a customer support bot - “What’s your latest refund policy?”. The LLM then fetches this info from internal knowledge base and crafts an accurate, up-to-date answer.
It's the most direct way to ground the model in your proprietary data, use up-to-the-minute information, and provide users with verifiable sources for its answers.
In our testing with a document creation assistant, RAG reduced factual hallucinations from 28% to 5%. The catch? It added 300ms of latency per query. For high-stakes accuracy requirements, this trade-off was absolutely worth it. For a casual chatbot, it might not be.
As your system matures, consider adding the following techniques to improve results :
Reranking : using a second model to score and re-order retrieved results
Hybrid search : combining vector search with keyword search
Query expansion : generating multiple query variations to improve recall.
Knowledge Graph Integration : When information is highly structured (org charts, product catalogs, dependencies), a knowledge graph is superior to simple text retrieval. It provides a logical, relational backbone for answering questions that depend on connections, not just text similarity. For example : “Which engineers work on project Phoenix and report to Bob?”
Knowledge graphs are powerful but harder to maintain than RAG. Most companies stick with vector search because it's simpler. Only use knowledge graphs when you have highly structured, relational data and queries that depend on complex relationships.
Memory Systems : Just like humans, LLMs perform better when they “remember.” To create coherent, stateful conversations, systems need memory. There are 2 types of memory:
Short-term memory (per session) : Helps the model remember the current conversation.
Long-term memory (stored in databases or vector stores) : Usually stores facts about the user or past interactions. This is used across sessions. These help retain user preferences, summaries, and context.
Context Management :
Context Compression/Summarization: Fit more knowledge into limited context windows. Instead of including entire documents, intelligently summarize or compress them while retaining the important information. This becomes critical as conversations grow longer or when working with extensive documentation.
Context Window Optimization: When you hit limits, you need strategies to prioritize what stays in context. Recent conversation + most relevant retrievals + critical system instructions should always win.
Layer 2 : The Control Layer - Reasoning & Tool Use
Goal: To move the model beyond a simple text generator into an agent that can think, plan, reason and take action.
Prompt Engineering & Prompt Chaining : This is the craft of giving perfect instructions. It's the highest ROI activity for any AI engineer. More often than not, you’ll find that the secret isn’t in more data - it’s in better instructions. Here a few prompt engineering techniques that you can try :
Chain of Thought (CoT) → The simple act of adding "Let's think step-by-step" forces the model to externalize its reasoning, dramatically improving accuracy on complex tasks
ReAct → A powerful framework where the model loops through Thought → Action → Observation. It reasons about what to do, calls a tool (an action), and observes the result before deciding the next step.
Self-Ask → The model breaks down complex questions into simpler sub-questions, answers each one, then combines them for the final answer. This technique has largely been subsumed by more sophisticated frameworks like ReAct.
Few-Shot Prompting → Show the model 2-5 examples of what you want before asking it to perform the task. It learns the pattern from your examples without any training.
Prompt Chaining : A technique that breaks a complex task into a sequence of smaller, connected steps, where the output of one prompt becomes the input for the next. This creates more reliable workflows than trying to do everything in one massive prompt.
Dynamic Context Injection (Adaptive prompting): Automatically choose what to include in the prompt based on user intent. Instead of always using the same system prompt, tailor it dynamically based on what the user is trying to do.
Structured Output generation : Force the model to return responses in a specific JSON or XML schema. This is essential for reliability when the output feeds into downstream systems. “Parse the response and hope for the best” breaks in production. Structured outputs with schema validation prevent 90% of integration headaches. Tools: OpenAI's structured outputs, Anthropic's tool use, Instructor, Outlines, Guidance. We reduced parsing errors from 12% to under 0.5% by switching from "please format as JSON" to strict schema enforcement.
Function Calling / Tool Use : This gives the LLM hands. By defining a set of "tools" (APIs, database queries, Python functions), the model can autonomously decide to fetch live data, send an email, or query your CRM. This is the bridge between the LLM's brain and the outside world. For example : the user asks “What is the current weather in Bangalore”, the model makes an api call to the weather api and gets the current data.
Multi Agent Systems : For problems too complex for one model, you build a team. Each agent has a specialized role (e.g., a "Researcher," a "Coder," a "Critic") and they collaborate, delegating tasks and exchanging information to achieve a complex goal. This is the architecture behind many advanced autonomous systems. Warning: Our first multi-agent system for code review created infinite loops where agents kept critiquing each other's critiques. We learned to add strict turn limits and a "coordinator" agent with veto power. Don't build multi-agent systems until you've exhausted simpler approaches.
Multi-Modal Integration : Extend beyond text to handle vision, audio, and images. Modern LLMs can now analyze images, transcribe audio, and generate visual content, making them much more versatile. Use cases: Analyzing screenshots or documents, processing receipts or forms, transcribing voice notes, visual question answering. Production Reality: Multi-modal adds complexity. Test thoroughly—vision models can misinterpret images in surprising ways.
Layer 3 : The Specialization layer - Adaptation & Fine Tuning
Goal : To adapt the model's fundamental behaviour, teaching it a new skill, style, or format that prompting alone can't achieve.
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT): This is the modern way to speacialize. Techniques like LoRA and QLoRA allow you a adapt a massive model by training only a tiny fraction of its parameters.
LoRA(Low-Rank Adaptation): Add trainable adapter layers while keeping the base model frozen. Efficient and effective.
QLoRA: LoRA with quantized models, making fine-tuning accessible even on consumer hardware.
The Golden Rule: Use RAG to give the model knowledge. Use fine-tuning to teach it a skill (e.g., perfectly mimicking your brand's voice, always responding in a specific JSON format).
Domain Fine Tuning : Specialize the model fro specific industry or tasks (medical, legal, customer service etc.). The model learns domain specific terminology, reasoning patterns and conventions. This is different from teaching facts - its about teaching how to think and communicate within a specific domain.
Instruction Tuning : Train the model to follow instructions better. This is how base models become chat models that actually respond helpfully to user requests. Most modern models you use have already undergone instruction tuning, but you can further specialize this for your specific use case.
Distillation : Training a smaller, faster “student” model (like TinyLlama) to mimic the outputs of a larger more powerful “teacher” model (like GPT-4). This is perfect for edge devices or applications where latency is critical.
Model Compression : This involves Quantization & Pruning.
Quantization : Reduce numerical precision of model weights (e.g from 16-bit to 4-bit numbers) to make the model model smaller and faster with minimal performance loss.
Pruning : Remove unnecessary weights from the model. Often combined with quantization for maximum efficiency.
Mixture of Experts (MoE) : An architecture where a large model is actually a collection of smaller “expert” sub-models. For any given input, a router activates only the relevant experts. This allows for models with massive parameter counts (like Mixtral 8x7B) while keeping inference costs manageable. Note : This is typically a model architecture type rather than something you implement as a technique.
Layer 4: The Production Layer - Optimization & reliability
Goal: To make the system fast, cost-effective, reliable, and ready for scale.
Inference Optimization : This is where the magic of performance engineering happens.
KV Caching (Key Value Caching) : A standard technique to drastically speed up text generation by using intermediate calculations. This is usually autoamatic in moden frameworks and dramatically speeds up long conversations.
Flash attention : An optimized attention mechanism that reduces memory usage and speeds up inference, especially for long sequences. This is now standard in most production frameworks.
Multi-Query Attention(MQA) & Grouped Query Attention (GQA) : Advanced algorithms that reduce the computational cost of attention by sharing key-value heads across query heads. This speeds up inference with minimal quality loss.
Quanitization : As mentioned in Layer 3, this technique also serves as a critical inference optimization. Reducing precision at inference time makes the model faster and cheaper to run.
Streaming responses : Send tokens as they’re generated rather than waiting for completion. This dramatically improves perceived performance and user experience, even if total generation time stays the same.
Batch Processing : Process multiple queries together when possible to maximize GPU utilization and throughput.
Caching startegies :
Semantic Caching: Same questions(or very similar) should ideally return cached response. Use embedding similarity to detect duplicates. Some companies see 50-70% cost reduction from this alone.
Prompt Caching : Reuse static parts of prompts (system instructions, few-shot examples). Most providers now support this natively, and can help in reducing costs by 50-80% on the cached portion.
Model Routing & Selection : Avoid usnig your most expensive model for every query. Route Intelligently. For simple queries, you can use faster, cheaper models(GPT-4o-mini, Gemini Flash or Claude Haiku). For complex reasoning, you can use more powerful models(GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4.5 or Gemini Pro). For specialized tasks you can use domain-specific fine tuned models. You can use a small classifier to determine query complexity, then route accordingly. This could result in huge savings when you think of production systems at scale.
Re-ranking & Post Processing : To further improve quality and just trusting the model’s first output, you can generate several candidate responses and then use second model or a set of rules to score and rerank them based on dimensions like : factual consistency with retrieved context, relevance to the query, helpfulness and clarity, adherence to tone/style guidelines etc. This adds a powerful quality control layer.
Self-Reflection & Self-Critique: The model critiques its own output before finalizing (techniques like Reflexion). This reduces hallucinations and improves reasoning by forcing the model to double-check its work. It works great in high-stakes tasks where accuracy matters more than latency. You can skip this in tasks such as real-time chat where speed matters as each self-reflection pass add latency and cost.
Other Guardrails & Safety:
Input Validation :
Detect prompt injection attempts
Screen for jailbreak patterns
Content filtering(NSFW, hate speech)
PII detection in user inputs
Output Validation
PII redaction (dont leak sensitive data)
Toxicity filtering
Factuality checking for high-stakes claims
Hallucination detection
Rate Limiting: Prevent abuse and manage costs per user/API key.
Some tools that can help here are Guardrails AI, NeMo Guardrails, LangKit, Microsoft Presidio for PII detection.
Error handling & Resiliency: Real systems need to handle failures gracefully. This can make the difference between a demo and a production system. Here are some simple techniques :
Retry Logic: Exponential backoff for transient failures
Timeouts : Dont let requests hang forever
Fallback responses : Have a sensible default when things break
Circuit breakers : Stop hammering a failing service.
Continuous Improvement and Human Oversight
Human in the loop: For high-stakes decisions, a human must validate the model’s output. This is the ultimate safety net.
Feedback loops : Collecting user feedback (explicit or implicit) to continuously create new, high-quality data. This data is then used to periodically fine-tune the model, creating a system that learns and evolves.
RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback): Collect user feedback on model outputs and use it to retrain or adjust the model. This is how ChatGPT became so much better at being helpful.
RLAIF (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback) : Use a model to evaluate output instead of humans. Cheaper and faster to implement than RLHF.
Active Learning : Let the system identify where it's weak, collect more training data for those areas, and improve continuously.
Testing & Quality Control : Use various testing methodologies such as Regression Testing, A/B testing, Adversarial Testing to evaluate before deploying changes.
Performance Monitoring : Track accuracy, latency, cost and user satisfaction continuously. You cant improve what you dont measure. Build automated eval sets from day one.
Prompt Management and Versioning : Treat prompts like code. Make sure to follow the following when dealing with prompts in production systems:
Version Control : Store prompts in git, not in your notebooks.
Rollback capability : When a prompt change breaks things, roll back instantly.
Template Management : Use template systems wit variables, not string concatenation
Change tracking : Log which prompt version generated each response.
Tying it all together: Lifecycle of a sample AI-Powered Request
Tying it all together: Lifecycle of a sample AI-Powered Request
Imagine you're building an AI Customer Support Assistant. A single query—"My order is late, what are my options?"—triggers a cascade of these techniques:
Step | Technique Used | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Input Validation (Guardrails) | Check for prompt injection, PII | Query is safe to process |
2 | Semantic Caching | Check if we've answered this before | Cache miss, continue |
3 | Function Calling | The model identifies the user's intent and calls | Order #7829 is 3 days delayed |
4 | RAG | It simultaneously retrieves the company's latest shipping & refund policies | Policy doc: "Orders 3+ days late qualify for 10% refund" |
5 | PEFT (LoRA Fine-Tune) | The core model has been fine-tuned to respond in your brand's empathetic tone | Response uses brand voice: "We're so sorry..." |
6 | ReAct Prompting | The model internally reasons: "Order is delayed. Policy says offer a 10% coupon. I will now draft the response." | Decision: Offer refund + apology |
7 | Memory System | It recalls the user's name and past issues to personalize the message | "Hi Sarah, we see this is your second delay this month..." |
8 | Structured Output | Format response as JSON for UI rendering | Clean, parseable response structure |
9 | Self-Reflection | Verify accuracy of information before sending | Confirms policy is correctly applied |
10 | Output Validation (Guardrails) | Check for PII, toxicity | Output is clean and safe |
11 | Inference Optimization | KV Caching and quantization ensure the response is generated quickly and cheaply | Response time: 1.2s, Cost: $0.003 |
12 | Human-in-the-Loop | If the issue is complex, the system flags it and escalates the entire context to a human agent | Auto-handled (complexity score: 0.4/1.0) |
13 | Monitoring & Logging | Record interaction for continuous improvement | Logged with prompt version, cost, latency |
What you’ve just seen is not a single “model call.” It’s an orchestrated AI system — the real engine behind reliable, production AI. This orchestrated system is far more powerful and useful than a single call to a base model.
How to Choose your stack
Not every technique belongs in every system. Here's how to prioritize:
If you’re hallucinating facts :
Add RAG first. This should solve 80% of accuracy issues.
If RAG isn’t enough, check your retrieval quality before blaming the model. Improve chunking, try reranking, experiment with hybrid search.
If you’re still struggling, consider fine-tuning, but only after exhausting prompt and retrieval improvements.
If the responses are self contradicting, add self-reflection.
If you’re getting the wrong tone/format:
Improve your prompts with examples and constraints.
Add structured output generation with schema validation.
If it’s still consistent and you have the resources, fine tune with PEFT to teach the specific style.
If you’re getting too slow :
Enable KV Caching
Implement streaming responses for better perceived performance.
Try quantization for 2-3x speedup with minimal quality loss.
Consider distillation for mobile or edge deployments.
Add semantic caching for common queries.
check if you have self-critique/self-reflection setup.
If tasks require multi-step reasoning
Start with Chain-of-thought prompting
Need to interact with external systems - add function calling
Very complex workflows - Implement ReAct patterns
Only if truly necessary - build multi agent systems.
If costs are too high
Audit your prompt length and context - unnecessary verbosity is expensive.
Implement semantic caching for 50-70% cost reduction on common queries.
Use model routing and choose cheaper model for simple queries.
Apply quantization to reduce inference costs by 40-70%.
Enable prompt caching for static system instructions.
If you need reliability & safety :
Add input/output guardrails for safety.
Implement error handling with retries and fallbacks.
Add human-in-the-loop for high-stakes decisions.
Build testing frameworks and monitor everything.
The Reality About LLMs in production
After building a few these systems, here's what I've learned:
Most improvements come from boring work: Better prompts, cleaner data, good error handling. Not fancy agent systems or custom models.
Start simple and iterate: A basic RAG system with tight feedback loops will solve majority of your problems instead of an over engineered multi-agent system.
Measure everything: If you don't have metrics, you're flying blind. Track cost, latency, quality, and user satisfaction religiously.
Users don't care about your architecture: They care about fast, accurate, helpful responses. Build for them, not for your portfolio.
The best technique is the one you'll actually maintain: A well-maintained simple system beats an abandoned complex one.
Costs matter more than you think: That $0.50/query seems fine until you're doing 100k queries/day. Optimize early.
Hallucinations are still the #1 problem: Every technique in this post is, at some level, about reducing hallucinations. Validate everything.
Final Thought
The key insight is that modern LLM systems are rarely just the model itself. They're carefully architected systems that combine multiple techniques to create reliable, capable, and cost-effective AI applications. The art is in knowing which techniques to combine for your specific use case. The next wave of innovation in AI will not come from building marginally bigger models, but from architecting smarter, more efficient, and more reliable systems around them.
The techniques in this playbook represent the collective wisdom of thousands of production deployments. Some will be essential for your use case. Others won't apply at all. Your job is to understand the full toolkit, measure relentlessly, and build the simplest system that solves the user's problem. The biggest "supercharging" technique isn't on any list—it's tight feedback loops. Ship fast, measure everything, talk to users, and iterate based on real usage. A simple RAG system with 100 hours of iteration based on real user feedback will beat a sophisticated multi-agent system built in isolation every time.
FAQ
FAQ
01
What kinds of projects have you managed?
02
What industries have you worked in?
03
What technical skills do you bring to the table?
04
What project management methodologies are you most familiar with?
05
Do you have experience managing remote or distributed teams?
06
How do you handle project risks and escalations?
07
What is your leadership style?
08
Are you open to freelance consulting / side projects ?
01
What kinds of projects have you managed?
02
What industries have you worked in?
03
What technical skills do you bring to the table?
04
What project management methodologies are you most familiar with?
05
Do you have experience managing remote or distributed teams?
06
How do you handle project risks and escalations?
07
What is your leadership style?
08
Are you open to freelance consulting / side projects ?


Oct 15, 2025
The Production LLM playbook
Techniques for making LLMs more useful, accurate and performant in production.
Generative AI
LLM
Introduction
The biggest misconception in AI right now is that the model is the product.
Your demo vowed the investors. Then you pushed to production and users complained it was slow, expensive, and occasionally hallucinated their customer data. Sound familiar?
While the raw power of models like GPT, Gemini, or Claude is astonishing, it's just the starting point. When you move from a cool demo to a production system—where accuracy, speed, cost, and reliability are non-negotiable—you quickly learn that the base model is just the engine. The real product is the entire vehicle built around it.
Modern AI systems are not just a single model; they are a stack of intelligent techniques layered around the core LLM. The difference between a fragile prototype and a robust AI product lies in how skillfully you architect this stack.
Over the last year, I’ve worked on and observed multiple production-grade LLM systems — and the difference between a prototype and a real-world AI product almost always comes down to how well you combine these techniques. Let's break down the modern playbook for how to supercharge LLMs for production :
Techniques
I’ve grouped these techniques into a few key categories
Layer 1 : The Foundation - Knowledge & Grounding
Goal: To connect the model factually accurate and contextually aware without expensive retraining. This is the single most effective way to reduce hallucinations.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) : Think of this as giving the model a live reference library. Instead of relying only on what it “knows” from pre-training, we fetch relevant documents from databases or vector stores, then feed them as context. You could use both structured or unstructured data for RAG. For example: A user asks a customer support bot - “What’s your latest refund policy?”. The LLM then fetches this info from internal knowledge base and crafts an accurate, up-to-date answer.
It's the most direct way to ground the model in your proprietary data, use up-to-the-minute information, and provide users with verifiable sources for its answers.
In our testing with a document creation assistant, RAG reduced factual hallucinations from 28% to 5%. The catch? It added 300ms of latency per query. For high-stakes accuracy requirements, this trade-off was absolutely worth it. For a casual chatbot, it might not be.
As your system matures, consider adding the following techniques to improve results :
Reranking : using a second model to score and re-order retrieved results
Hybrid search : combining vector search with keyword search
Query expansion : generating multiple query variations to improve recall.
Knowledge Graph Integration : When information is highly structured (org charts, product catalogs, dependencies), a knowledge graph is superior to simple text retrieval. It provides a logical, relational backbone for answering questions that depend on connections, not just text similarity. For example : “Which engineers work on project Phoenix and report to Bob?”
Knowledge graphs are powerful but harder to maintain than RAG. Most companies stick with vector search because it's simpler. Only use knowledge graphs when you have highly structured, relational data and queries that depend on complex relationships.
Memory Systems : Just like humans, LLMs perform better when they “remember.” To create coherent, stateful conversations, systems need memory. There are 2 types of memory:
Short-term memory (per session) : Helps the model remember the current conversation.
Long-term memory (stored in databases or vector stores) : Usually stores facts about the user or past interactions. This is used across sessions. These help retain user preferences, summaries, and context.
Context Management :
Context Compression/Summarization: Fit more knowledge into limited context windows. Instead of including entire documents, intelligently summarize or compress them while retaining the important information. This becomes critical as conversations grow longer or when working with extensive documentation.
Context Window Optimization: When you hit limits, you need strategies to prioritize what stays in context. Recent conversation + most relevant retrievals + critical system instructions should always win.
Layer 2 : The Control Layer - Reasoning & Tool Use
Goal: To move the model beyond a simple text generator into an agent that can think, plan, reason and take action.
Prompt Engineering & Prompt Chaining : This is the craft of giving perfect instructions. It's the highest ROI activity for any AI engineer. More often than not, you’ll find that the secret isn’t in more data - it’s in better instructions. Here a few prompt engineering techniques that you can try :
Chain of Thought (CoT) → The simple act of adding "Let's think step-by-step" forces the model to externalize its reasoning, dramatically improving accuracy on complex tasks
ReAct → A powerful framework where the model loops through Thought → Action → Observation. It reasons about what to do, calls a tool (an action), and observes the result before deciding the next step.
Self-Ask → The model breaks down complex questions into simpler sub-questions, answers each one, then combines them for the final answer. This technique has largely been subsumed by more sophisticated frameworks like ReAct.
Few-Shot Prompting → Show the model 2-5 examples of what you want before asking it to perform the task. It learns the pattern from your examples without any training.
Prompt Chaining : A technique that breaks a complex task into a sequence of smaller, connected steps, where the output of one prompt becomes the input for the next. This creates more reliable workflows than trying to do everything in one massive prompt.
Dynamic Context Injection (Adaptive prompting): Automatically choose what to include in the prompt based on user intent. Instead of always using the same system prompt, tailor it dynamically based on what the user is trying to do.
Structured Output generation : Force the model to return responses in a specific JSON or XML schema. This is essential for reliability when the output feeds into downstream systems. “Parse the response and hope for the best” breaks in production. Structured outputs with schema validation prevent 90% of integration headaches. Tools: OpenAI's structured outputs, Anthropic's tool use, Instructor, Outlines, Guidance. We reduced parsing errors from 12% to under 0.5% by switching from "please format as JSON" to strict schema enforcement.
Function Calling / Tool Use : This gives the LLM hands. By defining a set of "tools" (APIs, database queries, Python functions), the model can autonomously decide to fetch live data, send an email, or query your CRM. This is the bridge between the LLM's brain and the outside world. For example : the user asks “What is the current weather in Bangalore”, the model makes an api call to the weather api and gets the current data.
Multi Agent Systems : For problems too complex for one model, you build a team. Each agent has a specialized role (e.g., a "Researcher," a "Coder," a "Critic") and they collaborate, delegating tasks and exchanging information to achieve a complex goal. This is the architecture behind many advanced autonomous systems. Warning: Our first multi-agent system for code review created infinite loops where agents kept critiquing each other's critiques. We learned to add strict turn limits and a "coordinator" agent with veto power. Don't build multi-agent systems until you've exhausted simpler approaches.
Multi-Modal Integration : Extend beyond text to handle vision, audio, and images. Modern LLMs can now analyze images, transcribe audio, and generate visual content, making them much more versatile. Use cases: Analyzing screenshots or documents, processing receipts or forms, transcribing voice notes, visual question answering. Production Reality: Multi-modal adds complexity. Test thoroughly—vision models can misinterpret images in surprising ways.
Layer 3 : The Specialization layer - Adaptation & Fine Tuning
Goal : To adapt the model's fundamental behaviour, teaching it a new skill, style, or format that prompting alone can't achieve.
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT): This is the modern way to speacialize. Techniques like LoRA and QLoRA allow you a adapt a massive model by training only a tiny fraction of its parameters.
LoRA(Low-Rank Adaptation): Add trainable adapter layers while keeping the base model frozen. Efficient and effective.
QLoRA: LoRA with quantized models, making fine-tuning accessible even on consumer hardware.
The Golden Rule: Use RAG to give the model knowledge. Use fine-tuning to teach it a skill (e.g., perfectly mimicking your brand's voice, always responding in a specific JSON format).
Domain Fine Tuning : Specialize the model fro specific industry or tasks (medical, legal, customer service etc.). The model learns domain specific terminology, reasoning patterns and conventions. This is different from teaching facts - its about teaching how to think and communicate within a specific domain.
Instruction Tuning : Train the model to follow instructions better. This is how base models become chat models that actually respond helpfully to user requests. Most modern models you use have already undergone instruction tuning, but you can further specialize this for your specific use case.
Distillation : Training a smaller, faster “student” model (like TinyLlama) to mimic the outputs of a larger more powerful “teacher” model (like GPT-4). This is perfect for edge devices or applications where latency is critical.
Model Compression : This involves Quantization & Pruning.
Quantization : Reduce numerical precision of model weights (e.g from 16-bit to 4-bit numbers) to make the model model smaller and faster with minimal performance loss.
Pruning : Remove unnecessary weights from the model. Often combined with quantization for maximum efficiency.
Mixture of Experts (MoE) : An architecture where a large model is actually a collection of smaller “expert” sub-models. For any given input, a router activates only the relevant experts. This allows for models with massive parameter counts (like Mixtral 8x7B) while keeping inference costs manageable. Note : This is typically a model architecture type rather than something you implement as a technique.
Layer 4: The Production Layer - Optimization & reliability
Goal: To make the system fast, cost-effective, reliable, and ready for scale.
Inference Optimization : This is where the magic of performance engineering happens.
KV Caching (Key Value Caching) : A standard technique to drastically speed up text generation by using intermediate calculations. This is usually autoamatic in moden frameworks and dramatically speeds up long conversations.
Flash attention : An optimized attention mechanism that reduces memory usage and speeds up inference, especially for long sequences. This is now standard in most production frameworks.
Multi-Query Attention(MQA) & Grouped Query Attention (GQA) : Advanced algorithms that reduce the computational cost of attention by sharing key-value heads across query heads. This speeds up inference with minimal quality loss.
Quanitization : As mentioned in Layer 3, this technique also serves as a critical inference optimization. Reducing precision at inference time makes the model faster and cheaper to run.
Streaming responses : Send tokens as they’re generated rather than waiting for completion. This dramatically improves perceived performance and user experience, even if total generation time stays the same.
Batch Processing : Process multiple queries together when possible to maximize GPU utilization and throughput.
Caching startegies :
Semantic Caching: Same questions(or very similar) should ideally return cached response. Use embedding similarity to detect duplicates. Some companies see 50-70% cost reduction from this alone.
Prompt Caching : Reuse static parts of prompts (system instructions, few-shot examples). Most providers now support this natively, and can help in reducing costs by 50-80% on the cached portion.
Model Routing & Selection : Avoid usnig your most expensive model for every query. Route Intelligently. For simple queries, you can use faster, cheaper models(GPT-4o-mini, Gemini Flash or Claude Haiku). For complex reasoning, you can use more powerful models(GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4.5 or Gemini Pro). For specialized tasks you can use domain-specific fine tuned models. You can use a small classifier to determine query complexity, then route accordingly. This could result in huge savings when you think of production systems at scale.
Re-ranking & Post Processing : To further improve quality and just trusting the model’s first output, you can generate several candidate responses and then use second model or a set of rules to score and rerank them based on dimensions like : factual consistency with retrieved context, relevance to the query, helpfulness and clarity, adherence to tone/style guidelines etc. This adds a powerful quality control layer.
Self-Reflection & Self-Critique: The model critiques its own output before finalizing (techniques like Reflexion). This reduces hallucinations and improves reasoning by forcing the model to double-check its work. It works great in high-stakes tasks where accuracy matters more than latency. You can skip this in tasks such as real-time chat where speed matters as each self-reflection pass add latency and cost.
Other Guardrails & Safety:
Input Validation :
Detect prompt injection attempts
Screen for jailbreak patterns
Content filtering(NSFW, hate speech)
PII detection in user inputs
Output Validation
PII redaction (dont leak sensitive data)
Toxicity filtering
Factuality checking for high-stakes claims
Hallucination detection
Rate Limiting: Prevent abuse and manage costs per user/API key.
Some tools that can help here are Guardrails AI, NeMo Guardrails, LangKit, Microsoft Presidio for PII detection.
Error handling & Resiliency: Real systems need to handle failures gracefully. This can make the difference between a demo and a production system. Here are some simple techniques :
Retry Logic: Exponential backoff for transient failures
Timeouts : Dont let requests hang forever
Fallback responses : Have a sensible default when things break
Circuit breakers : Stop hammering a failing service.
Continuous Improvement and Human Oversight
Human in the loop: For high-stakes decisions, a human must validate the model’s output. This is the ultimate safety net.
Feedback loops : Collecting user feedback (explicit or implicit) to continuously create new, high-quality data. This data is then used to periodically fine-tune the model, creating a system that learns and evolves.
RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback): Collect user feedback on model outputs and use it to retrain or adjust the model. This is how ChatGPT became so much better at being helpful.
RLAIF (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback) : Use a model to evaluate output instead of humans. Cheaper and faster to implement than RLHF.
Active Learning : Let the system identify where it's weak, collect more training data for those areas, and improve continuously.
Testing & Quality Control : Use various testing methodologies such as Regression Testing, A/B testing, Adversarial Testing to evaluate before deploying changes.
Performance Monitoring : Track accuracy, latency, cost and user satisfaction continuously. You cant improve what you dont measure. Build automated eval sets from day one.
Prompt Management and Versioning : Treat prompts like code. Make sure to follow the following when dealing with prompts in production systems:
Version Control : Store prompts in git, not in your notebooks.
Rollback capability : When a prompt change breaks things, roll back instantly.
Template Management : Use template systems wit variables, not string concatenation
Change tracking : Log which prompt version generated each response.
Tying it all together: Lifecycle of a sample AI-Powered Request
Imagine you're building an AI Customer Support Assistant. A single query—"My order is late, what are my options?"—triggers a cascade of these techniques:
Step | Technique Used | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Input Validation (Guardrails) | Check for prompt injection, PII | Query is safe to process |
2 | Semantic Caching | Check if we've answered this before | Cache miss, continue |
3 | Function Calling | The model identifies the user's intent and calls | Order #7829 is 3 days delayed |
4 | RAG | It simultaneously retrieves the company's latest shipping & refund policies | Policy doc: "Orders 3+ days late qualify for 10% refund" |
5 | PEFT (LoRA Fine-Tune) | The core model has been fine-tuned to respond in your brand's empathetic tone | Response uses brand voice: "We're so sorry..." |
6 | ReAct Prompting | The model internally reasons: "Order is delayed. Policy says offer a 10% coupon. I will now draft the response." | Decision: Offer refund + apology |
7 | Memory System | It recalls the user's name and past issues to personalize the message | "Hi Sarah, we see this is your second delay this month..." |
8 | Structured Output | Format response as JSON for UI rendering | Clean, parseable response structure |
9 | Self-Reflection | Verify accuracy of information before sending | Confirms policy is correctly applied |
10 | Output Validation (Guardrails) | Check for PII, toxicity | Output is clean and safe |
11 | Inference Optimization | KV Caching and quantization ensure the response is generated quickly and cheaply | Response time: 1.2s, Cost: $0.003 |
12 | Human-in-the-Loop | If the issue is complex, the system flags it and escalates the entire context to a human agent | Auto-handled (complexity score: 0.4/1.0) |
13 | Monitoring & Logging | Record interaction for continuous improvement | Logged with prompt version, cost, latency |
What you’ve just seen is not a single “model call.” It’s an orchestrated AI system — the real engine behind reliable, production AI. This orchestrated system is far more powerful and useful than a single call to a base model.
How to Choose your stack
Not every technique belongs in every system. Here's how to prioritize:
If you’re hallucinating facts :
Add RAG first. This should solve 80% of accuracy issues.
If RAG isn’t enough, check your retrieval quality before blaming the model. Improve chunking, try reranking, experiment with hybrid search.
If you’re still struggling, consider fine-tuning, but only after exhausting prompt and retrieval improvements.
If the responses are self contradicting, add self-reflection.
If you’re getting the wrong tone/format:
Improve your prompts with examples and constraints.
Add structured output generation with schema validation.
If it’s still consistent and you have the resources, fine tune with PEFT to teach the specific style.
If you’re getting too slow :
Enable KV Caching
Implement streaming responses for better perceived performance.
Try quantization for 2-3x speedup with minimal quality loss.
Consider distillation for mobile or edge deployments.
Add semantic caching for common queries.
check if you have self-critique/self-reflection setup.
If tasks require multi-step reasoning
Start with Chain-of-thought prompting
Need to interact with external systems - add function calling
Very complex workflows - Implement ReAct patterns
Only if truly necessary - build multi agent systems.
If costs are too high
Audit your prompt length and context - unnecessary verbosity is expensive.
Implement semantic caching for 50-70% cost reduction on common queries.
Use model routing and choose cheaper model for simple queries.
Apply quantization to reduce inference costs by 40-70%.
Enable prompt caching for static system instructions.
If you need reliability & safety :
Add input/output guardrails for safety.
Implement error handling with retries and fallbacks.
Add human-in-the-loop for high-stakes decisions.
Build testing frameworks and monitor everything.
The Reality About LLMs in production
After building a few these systems, here's what I've learned:
Most improvements come from boring work: Better prompts, cleaner data, good error handling. Not fancy agent systems or custom models.
Start simple and iterate: A basic RAG system with tight feedback loops will solve majority of your problems instead of an over engineered multi-agent system.
Measure everything: If you don't have metrics, you're flying blind. Track cost, latency, quality, and user satisfaction religiously.
Users don't care about your architecture: They care about fast, accurate, helpful responses. Build for them, not for your portfolio.
The best technique is the one you'll actually maintain: A well-maintained simple system beats an abandoned complex one.
Costs matter more than you think: That $0.50/query seems fine until you're doing 100k queries/day. Optimize early.
Hallucinations are still the #1 problem: Every technique in this post is, at some level, about reducing hallucinations. Validate everything.
Final Thought
The key insight is that modern LLM systems are rarely just the model itself. They're carefully architected systems that combine multiple techniques to create reliable, capable, and cost-effective AI applications. The art is in knowing which techniques to combine for your specific use case. The next wave of innovation in AI will not come from building marginally bigger models, but from architecting smarter, more efficient, and more reliable systems around them.
The techniques in this playbook represent the collective wisdom of thousands of production deployments. Some will be essential for your use case. Others won't apply at all. Your job is to understand the full toolkit, measure relentlessly, and build the simplest system that solves the user's problem. The biggest "supercharging" technique isn't on any list—it's tight feedback loops. Ship fast, measure everything, talk to users, and iterate based on real usage. A simple RAG system with 100 hours of iteration based on real user feedback will beat a sophisticated multi-agent system built in isolation every time.
FAQ
01
What kinds of projects have you managed?
02
What industries have you worked in?
03
What technical skills do you bring to the table?
04
What project management methodologies are you most familiar with?
05
Do you have experience managing remote or distributed teams?
06
How do you handle project risks and escalations?
07
What is your leadership style?
08
Are you open to freelance consulting / side projects ?


Oct 15, 2025
The Production LLM playbook
Techniques for making LLMs more useful, accurate and performant in production.
Generative AI
LLM
Introduction
The biggest misconception in AI right now is that the model is the product.
Your demo vowed the investors. Then you pushed to production and users complained it was slow, expensive, and occasionally hallucinated their customer data. Sound familiar?
While the raw power of models like GPT, Gemini, or Claude is astonishing, it's just the starting point. When you move from a cool demo to a production system—where accuracy, speed, cost, and reliability are non-negotiable—you quickly learn that the base model is just the engine. The real product is the entire vehicle built around it.
Modern AI systems are not just a single model; they are a stack of intelligent techniques layered around the core LLM. The difference between a fragile prototype and a robust AI product lies in how skillfully you architect this stack.
Over the last year, I’ve worked on and observed multiple production-grade LLM systems — and the difference between a prototype and a real-world AI product almost always comes down to how well you combine these techniques. Let's break down the modern playbook for how to supercharge LLMs for production :
Techniques
I’ve grouped these techniques into a few key categories
Layer 1 : The Foundation - Knowledge & Grounding
Goal: To connect the model factually accurate and contextually aware without expensive retraining. This is the single most effective way to reduce hallucinations.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) : Think of this as giving the model a live reference library. Instead of relying only on what it “knows” from pre-training, we fetch relevant documents from databases or vector stores, then feed them as context. You could use both structured or unstructured data for RAG. For example: A user asks a customer support bot - “What’s your latest refund policy?”. The LLM then fetches this info from internal knowledge base and crafts an accurate, up-to-date answer.
It's the most direct way to ground the model in your proprietary data, use up-to-the-minute information, and provide users with verifiable sources for its answers.
In our testing with a document creation assistant, RAG reduced factual hallucinations from 28% to 5%. The catch? It added 300ms of latency per query. For high-stakes accuracy requirements, this trade-off was absolutely worth it. For a casual chatbot, it might not be.
As your system matures, consider adding the following techniques to improve results :
Reranking : using a second model to score and re-order retrieved results
Hybrid search : combining vector search with keyword search
Query expansion : generating multiple query variations to improve recall.
Knowledge Graph Integration : When information is highly structured (org charts, product catalogs, dependencies), a knowledge graph is superior to simple text retrieval. It provides a logical, relational backbone for answering questions that depend on connections, not just text similarity. For example : “Which engineers work on project Phoenix and report to Bob?”
Knowledge graphs are powerful but harder to maintain than RAG. Most companies stick with vector search because it's simpler. Only use knowledge graphs when you have highly structured, relational data and queries that depend on complex relationships.
Memory Systems : Just like humans, LLMs perform better when they “remember.” To create coherent, stateful conversations, systems need memory. There are 2 types of memory:
Short-term memory (per session) : Helps the model remember the current conversation.
Long-term memory (stored in databases or vector stores) : Usually stores facts about the user or past interactions. This is used across sessions. These help retain user preferences, summaries, and context.
Context Management :
Context Compression/Summarization: Fit more knowledge into limited context windows. Instead of including entire documents, intelligently summarize or compress them while retaining the important information. This becomes critical as conversations grow longer or when working with extensive documentation.
Context Window Optimization: When you hit limits, you need strategies to prioritize what stays in context. Recent conversation + most relevant retrievals + critical system instructions should always win.
Layer 2 : The Control Layer - Reasoning & Tool Use
Goal: To move the model beyond a simple text generator into an agent that can think, plan, reason and take action.
Prompt Engineering & Prompt Chaining : This is the craft of giving perfect instructions. It's the highest ROI activity for any AI engineer. More often than not, you’ll find that the secret isn’t in more data - it’s in better instructions. Here a few prompt engineering techniques that you can try :
Chain of Thought (CoT) → The simple act of adding "Let's think step-by-step" forces the model to externalize its reasoning, dramatically improving accuracy on complex tasks
ReAct → A powerful framework where the model loops through Thought → Action → Observation. It reasons about what to do, calls a tool (an action), and observes the result before deciding the next step.
Self-Ask → The model breaks down complex questions into simpler sub-questions, answers each one, then combines them for the final answer. This technique has largely been subsumed by more sophisticated frameworks like ReAct.
Few-Shot Prompting → Show the model 2-5 examples of what you want before asking it to perform the task. It learns the pattern from your examples without any training.
Prompt Chaining : A technique that breaks a complex task into a sequence of smaller, connected steps, where the output of one prompt becomes the input for the next. This creates more reliable workflows than trying to do everything in one massive prompt.
Dynamic Context Injection (Adaptive prompting): Automatically choose what to include in the prompt based on user intent. Instead of always using the same system prompt, tailor it dynamically based on what the user is trying to do.
Structured Output generation : Force the model to return responses in a specific JSON or XML schema. This is essential for reliability when the output feeds into downstream systems. “Parse the response and hope for the best” breaks in production. Structured outputs with schema validation prevent 90% of integration headaches. Tools: OpenAI's structured outputs, Anthropic's tool use, Instructor, Outlines, Guidance. We reduced parsing errors from 12% to under 0.5% by switching from "please format as JSON" to strict schema enforcement.
Function Calling / Tool Use : This gives the LLM hands. By defining a set of "tools" (APIs, database queries, Python functions), the model can autonomously decide to fetch live data, send an email, or query your CRM. This is the bridge between the LLM's brain and the outside world. For example : the user asks “What is the current weather in Bangalore”, the model makes an api call to the weather api and gets the current data.
Multi Agent Systems : For problems too complex for one model, you build a team. Each agent has a specialized role (e.g., a "Researcher," a "Coder," a "Critic") and they collaborate, delegating tasks and exchanging information to achieve a complex goal. This is the architecture behind many advanced autonomous systems. Warning: Our first multi-agent system for code review created infinite loops where agents kept critiquing each other's critiques. We learned to add strict turn limits and a "coordinator" agent with veto power. Don't build multi-agent systems until you've exhausted simpler approaches.
Multi-Modal Integration : Extend beyond text to handle vision, audio, and images. Modern LLMs can now analyze images, transcribe audio, and generate visual content, making them much more versatile. Use cases: Analyzing screenshots or documents, processing receipts or forms, transcribing voice notes, visual question answering. Production Reality: Multi-modal adds complexity. Test thoroughly—vision models can misinterpret images in surprising ways.
Layer 3 : The Specialization layer - Adaptation & Fine Tuning
Goal : To adapt the model's fundamental behaviour, teaching it a new skill, style, or format that prompting alone can't achieve.
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT): This is the modern way to speacialize. Techniques like LoRA and QLoRA allow you a adapt a massive model by training only a tiny fraction of its parameters.
LoRA(Low-Rank Adaptation): Add trainable adapter layers while keeping the base model frozen. Efficient and effective.
QLoRA: LoRA with quantized models, making fine-tuning accessible even on consumer hardware.
The Golden Rule: Use RAG to give the model knowledge. Use fine-tuning to teach it a skill (e.g., perfectly mimicking your brand's voice, always responding in a specific JSON format).
Domain Fine Tuning : Specialize the model fro specific industry or tasks (medical, legal, customer service etc.). The model learns domain specific terminology, reasoning patterns and conventions. This is different from teaching facts - its about teaching how to think and communicate within a specific domain.
Instruction Tuning : Train the model to follow instructions better. This is how base models become chat models that actually respond helpfully to user requests. Most modern models you use have already undergone instruction tuning, but you can further specialize this for your specific use case.
Distillation : Training a smaller, faster “student” model (like TinyLlama) to mimic the outputs of a larger more powerful “teacher” model (like GPT-4). This is perfect for edge devices or applications where latency is critical.
Model Compression : This involves Quantization & Pruning.
Quantization : Reduce numerical precision of model weights (e.g from 16-bit to 4-bit numbers) to make the model model smaller and faster with minimal performance loss.
Pruning : Remove unnecessary weights from the model. Often combined with quantization for maximum efficiency.
Mixture of Experts (MoE) : An architecture where a large model is actually a collection of smaller “expert” sub-models. For any given input, a router activates only the relevant experts. This allows for models with massive parameter counts (like Mixtral 8x7B) while keeping inference costs manageable. Note : This is typically a model architecture type rather than something you implement as a technique.
Layer 4: The Production Layer - Optimization & reliability
Goal: To make the system fast, cost-effective, reliable, and ready for scale.
Inference Optimization : This is where the magic of performance engineering happens.
KV Caching (Key Value Caching) : A standard technique to drastically speed up text generation by using intermediate calculations. This is usually autoamatic in moden frameworks and dramatically speeds up long conversations.
Flash attention : An optimized attention mechanism that reduces memory usage and speeds up inference, especially for long sequences. This is now standard in most production frameworks.
Multi-Query Attention(MQA) & Grouped Query Attention (GQA) : Advanced algorithms that reduce the computational cost of attention by sharing key-value heads across query heads. This speeds up inference with minimal quality loss.
Quanitization : As mentioned in Layer 3, this technique also serves as a critical inference optimization. Reducing precision at inference time makes the model faster and cheaper to run.
Streaming responses : Send tokens as they’re generated rather than waiting for completion. This dramatically improves perceived performance and user experience, even if total generation time stays the same.
Batch Processing : Process multiple queries together when possible to maximize GPU utilization and throughput.
Caching startegies :
Semantic Caching: Same questions(or very similar) should ideally return cached response. Use embedding similarity to detect duplicates. Some companies see 50-70% cost reduction from this alone.
Prompt Caching : Reuse static parts of prompts (system instructions, few-shot examples). Most providers now support this natively, and can help in reducing costs by 50-80% on the cached portion.
Model Routing & Selection : Avoid usnig your most expensive model for every query. Route Intelligently. For simple queries, you can use faster, cheaper models(GPT-4o-mini, Gemini Flash or Claude Haiku). For complex reasoning, you can use more powerful models(GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4.5 or Gemini Pro). For specialized tasks you can use domain-specific fine tuned models. You can use a small classifier to determine query complexity, then route accordingly. This could result in huge savings when you think of production systems at scale.
Re-ranking & Post Processing : To further improve quality and just trusting the model’s first output, you can generate several candidate responses and then use second model or a set of rules to score and rerank them based on dimensions like : factual consistency with retrieved context, relevance to the query, helpfulness and clarity, adherence to tone/style guidelines etc. This adds a powerful quality control layer.
Self-Reflection & Self-Critique: The model critiques its own output before finalizing (techniques like Reflexion). This reduces hallucinations and improves reasoning by forcing the model to double-check its work. It works great in high-stakes tasks where accuracy matters more than latency. You can skip this in tasks such as real-time chat where speed matters as each self-reflection pass add latency and cost.
Other Guardrails & Safety:
Input Validation :
Detect prompt injection attempts
Screen for jailbreak patterns
Content filtering(NSFW, hate speech)
PII detection in user inputs
Output Validation
PII redaction (dont leak sensitive data)
Toxicity filtering
Factuality checking for high-stakes claims
Hallucination detection
Rate Limiting: Prevent abuse and manage costs per user/API key.
Some tools that can help here are Guardrails AI, NeMo Guardrails, LangKit, Microsoft Presidio for PII detection.
Error handling & Resiliency: Real systems need to handle failures gracefully. This can make the difference between a demo and a production system. Here are some simple techniques :
Retry Logic: Exponential backoff for transient failures
Timeouts : Dont let requests hang forever
Fallback responses : Have a sensible default when things break
Circuit breakers : Stop hammering a failing service.
Continuous Improvement and Human Oversight
Human in the loop: For high-stakes decisions, a human must validate the model’s output. This is the ultimate safety net.
Feedback loops : Collecting user feedback (explicit or implicit) to continuously create new, high-quality data. This data is then used to periodically fine-tune the model, creating a system that learns and evolves.
RLHF (Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback): Collect user feedback on model outputs and use it to retrain or adjust the model. This is how ChatGPT became so much better at being helpful.
RLAIF (Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback) : Use a model to evaluate output instead of humans. Cheaper and faster to implement than RLHF.
Active Learning : Let the system identify where it's weak, collect more training data for those areas, and improve continuously.
Testing & Quality Control : Use various testing methodologies such as Regression Testing, A/B testing, Adversarial Testing to evaluate before deploying changes.
Performance Monitoring : Track accuracy, latency, cost and user satisfaction continuously. You cant improve what you dont measure. Build automated eval sets from day one.
Prompt Management and Versioning : Treat prompts like code. Make sure to follow the following when dealing with prompts in production systems:
Version Control : Store prompts in git, not in your notebooks.
Rollback capability : When a prompt change breaks things, roll back instantly.
Template Management : Use template systems wit variables, not string concatenation
Change tracking : Log which prompt version generated each response.
Tying it all together: Lifecycle of a sample AI-Powered Request
Imagine you're building an AI Customer Support Assistant. A single query—"My order is late, what are my options?"—triggers a cascade of these techniques:
Step | Technique Used | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Input Validation (Guardrails) | Check for prompt injection, PII | Query is safe to process |
2 | Semantic Caching | Check if we've answered this before | Cache miss, continue |
3 | Function Calling | The model identifies the user's intent and calls | Order #7829 is 3 days delayed |
4 | RAG | It simultaneously retrieves the company's latest shipping & refund policies | Policy doc: "Orders 3+ days late qualify for 10% refund" |
5 | PEFT (LoRA Fine-Tune) | The core model has been fine-tuned to respond in your brand's empathetic tone | Response uses brand voice: "We're so sorry..." |
6 | ReAct Prompting | The model internally reasons: "Order is delayed. Policy says offer a 10% coupon. I will now draft the response." | Decision: Offer refund + apology |
7 | Memory System | It recalls the user's name and past issues to personalize the message | "Hi Sarah, we see this is your second delay this month..." |
8 | Structured Output | Format response as JSON for UI rendering | Clean, parseable response structure |
9 | Self-Reflection | Verify accuracy of information before sending | Confirms policy is correctly applied |
10 | Output Validation (Guardrails) | Check for PII, toxicity | Output is clean and safe |
11 | Inference Optimization | KV Caching and quantization ensure the response is generated quickly and cheaply | Response time: 1.2s, Cost: $0.003 |
12 | Human-in-the-Loop | If the issue is complex, the system flags it and escalates the entire context to a human agent | Auto-handled (complexity score: 0.4/1.0) |
13 | Monitoring & Logging | Record interaction for continuous improvement | Logged with prompt version, cost, latency |
What you’ve just seen is not a single “model call.” It’s an orchestrated AI system — the real engine behind reliable, production AI. This orchestrated system is far more powerful and useful than a single call to a base model.
How to Choose your stack
Not every technique belongs in every system. Here's how to prioritize:
If you’re hallucinating facts :
Add RAG first. This should solve 80% of accuracy issues.
If RAG isn’t enough, check your retrieval quality before blaming the model. Improve chunking, try reranking, experiment with hybrid search.
If you’re still struggling, consider fine-tuning, but only after exhausting prompt and retrieval improvements.
If the responses are self contradicting, add self-reflection.
If you’re getting the wrong tone/format:
Improve your prompts with examples and constraints.
Add structured output generation with schema validation.
If it’s still consistent and you have the resources, fine tune with PEFT to teach the specific style.
If you’re getting too slow :
Enable KV Caching
Implement streaming responses for better perceived performance.
Try quantization for 2-3x speedup with minimal quality loss.
Consider distillation for mobile or edge deployments.
Add semantic caching for common queries.
check if you have self-critique/self-reflection setup.
If tasks require multi-step reasoning
Start with Chain-of-thought prompting
Need to interact with external systems - add function calling
Very complex workflows - Implement ReAct patterns
Only if truly necessary - build multi agent systems.
If costs are too high
Audit your prompt length and context - unnecessary verbosity is expensive.
Implement semantic caching for 50-70% cost reduction on common queries.
Use model routing and choose cheaper model for simple queries.
Apply quantization to reduce inference costs by 40-70%.
Enable prompt caching for static system instructions.
If you need reliability & safety :
Add input/output guardrails for safety.
Implement error handling with retries and fallbacks.
Add human-in-the-loop for high-stakes decisions.
Build testing frameworks and monitor everything.
The Reality About LLMs in production
After building a few these systems, here's what I've learned:
Most improvements come from boring work: Better prompts, cleaner data, good error handling. Not fancy agent systems or custom models.
Start simple and iterate: A basic RAG system with tight feedback loops will solve majority of your problems instead of an over engineered multi-agent system.
Measure everything: If you don't have metrics, you're flying blind. Track cost, latency, quality, and user satisfaction religiously.
Users don't care about your architecture: They care about fast, accurate, helpful responses. Build for them, not for your portfolio.
The best technique is the one you'll actually maintain: A well-maintained simple system beats an abandoned complex one.
Costs matter more than you think: That $0.50/query seems fine until you're doing 100k queries/day. Optimize early.
Hallucinations are still the #1 problem: Every technique in this post is, at some level, about reducing hallucinations. Validate everything.
Final Thought
The key insight is that modern LLM systems are rarely just the model itself. They're carefully architected systems that combine multiple techniques to create reliable, capable, and cost-effective AI applications. The art is in knowing which techniques to combine for your specific use case. The next wave of innovation in AI will not come from building marginally bigger models, but from architecting smarter, more efficient, and more reliable systems around them.
The techniques in this playbook represent the collective wisdom of thousands of production deployments. Some will be essential for your use case. Others won't apply at all. Your job is to understand the full toolkit, measure relentlessly, and build the simplest system that solves the user's problem. The biggest "supercharging" technique isn't on any list—it's tight feedback loops. Ship fast, measure everything, talk to users, and iterate based on real usage. A simple RAG system with 100 hours of iteration based on real user feedback will beat a sophisticated multi-agent system built in isolation every time.
FAQ
What kinds of projects have you managed?
What industries have you worked in?
What technical skills do you bring to the table?
What project management methodologies are you most familiar with?
Do you have experience managing remote or distributed teams?
How do you handle project risks and escalations?
What is your leadership style?
Are you open to freelance consulting / side projects ?

